Lecture Description
In this lecture from his Fayetteville State University Critical Thinking class, Dr. Sadler discusses and gives examples of the closely related fallacies of Composition and Division. He also discusses what characteristics make these fallacies, and instances when arguments which move from wholes to parts of vice versa are not fallacies.
Course Index
- Issues, Claims, Arguments
- Arguments and non-Arguments
- Value Judgements
- Complex Arguments, Unstated Premises
- Deductive and Inductive Arguments with Implicit Premises
- Deductive and Inductive Arguments 1
- Deductive and Inductive Arguments 2
- Deductive and Inductive Arguments 3
- Fallacies of Composition and Divison
- Information Sources
- Experts and Appeal to Authority
- Critical Thinking and Advertising
- Rhetorical Devices 1
- Rhetorical Devices 2
- Rhetorical Devices 3
- Fallacies 1
- Fallacies 2
- Fallacies 3
- Fallacies 4
- Fallacies 5
- Fallacies 6
- Inductive Arguments 1
- Inductive Arguments 2
- Inductive Arguments 3
Course Description
This is a series of 24 lectures from Dr. Sadler's Critical Thinking classes at Fayetteville State University, taught in Spring 2011. The textbook used was Moore And Parker's Critical Thinking 9th Ed.
Comments
There are no comments.
Be the first to post one.
Posting Comment...