The lecture focuses exclusively on one argument for the immortality of the soul from Plato's Phaedo, namely, "the argument from simplicity." Plato suggests that in order for something to be destroyed, it must have parts, that is, it must be possible to "take it apart." Arguing that the soul is simple, that it does not have parts, Plato believes that it would logically follow that the soul is indestructible.

1. Course Introduction
2. The Nature of Persons: Dualism vs. Physicalism
3. Arguments for the Existence of the Soul, Part I
4. Introduction to Plato's Phaedo; Arguments for the existence of the soul, Part II
5. Arguments for the existence of the soul, Part III: Free will and near-death experiences
6. Arguments for the existence of the soul, Part IV; Plato, Part I
7. Plato, Part II: Arguments for the immortality of the soul
8. Plato, Part III: Arguments for the immortality of the soul (cont.)
9. Plato, Part IV: Arguments for the immortality of the soul (cont.)
10. Personal identity, Part I: Identity across space and time and the soul theory
11. Personal identity, Part II: The body theory and the personality theory
12. Personal identity, Part III: Objections to the personality theory
13. Personal identity, Part IV; What matters?
14. What matters (cont.); The nature of death, Part I
15. The nature of death (cont.); Believing you will die
16. Dying Alone; The Badness of Death, Part I
17. The Badness of Death, Part II: The Deprivation Account
18. The Badness of Death, Part III; Immortality, Part I
19. Immortality Part II; The Value of Life, Part I
20. The Value of Life, Part II; Other Bad Aspects of Death, Part I
21. Other Bad Aspects of Death, Part II
22. Fear of Death
23. Suicide, Part I: The Rationality of Suicide
24. Suicide, Part II: Deciding Under Uncertainty
25. Suicide, Part III: The Morality of Suicide and Course Conclusion

There is one thing I can be sure of: I am going to die. But what am I to make of that fact? This course will examine a number of issues that arise once we begin to reflect on our mortality. The possibility that death may not actually be the end is considered. Are we, in some sense, immortal? Would immortality be desirable? Also a clearer notion of what it is to die is examined. What does it mean to say that a person has died? What kind of fact is that? And, finally, different attitudes to death are evaluated. Is death an evil? How? Why? Is suicide morally permissible? Is it rational? How should the knowledge that I am going to die affect the way I live my life?